State v. Lang
This text of 935 N.E.2d 425 (State v. Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stark C.P. No. 2006 CR 1824A. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for supplemental briefing,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
Appellant shall file a supplemental brief within ten days of the date of this entry addressing whether post-release control was properly imposed in light of the court’s decision in State v. Fry, 125 Ohio St.3d 163, 2010-0hio-1017, 926 N.E.2d 1239. Appellee shall file a response within ten days of the filing of appellant’s brief. Reply briefs shall not be filed, and the Clerk’s Office shall refuse to file any reply briefs or requests for extension of time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
935 N.E.2d 425, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lang-ohio-2010.