State v. Lang

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lang

215 S.W.3d 736, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2007 WL 221028

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2007·No. No. ED 87815·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Thomas Edward Lang (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County convicting him, following a jury trial, of one count of second-degree arson, section 569.050, RSMo 2004. Defendant was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment run[737] ning consecutively to his probation violations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Thomas Edward Lang (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County convicting him, following a jury trial, of one count of second-degree arson, section 569.050, RSMo 2004. Defendant was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment run[737] ning consecutively to his probation violations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

State v. Lang, 215 S.W.3d 736, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2007 WL 221028 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 736 (State v. Lang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.