State v. Laney

759 S.E.2d 84, 366 N.C. 426, 2013 WL 8697956, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1338
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 24, 2013·No. 228P12·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA11-1173)

2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. State’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

5. Def’s Motion to Amend NOA and PDR
6. Def’s Second Motion to Amend NOA and PDR
1. - - -
2. Denied
3. Allowed

. Dismissed as Moot

5. Allowed
6. Allowed

Beasley, J., Recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Laney, 759 S.E.2d 84, 366 N.C. 426, 2013 WL 8697956, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1338 (N.C. 2013).

759 S.E.2d 84 (State v. Laney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31