State v. Lane

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Lane

486 A.2d 159, 1985 Me. LEXIS 610

DecidedJanuary 14, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 486 A.2d 159 (State v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lane, 486 A.2d 159, 1985 Me. LEXIS 610 (Me. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Daniel Lane appeals from a judgment of conviction, Superior Court, Waldo County, of operating a motor vehicle after revocation in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (1983-1984). He assigns error in (1) denial of a mistrial, (2) insufficiency of the evidence, and (3) ineffectiveness of counsel in failing to move for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s case.

A careful review of the record reveals the court did not err in denying the motion for mistrial and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and withstand a motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s ease. State v. Gilbert, 473 A.2d 1273, 1275 (Me.1984); State v. Van Sickle, 434 A.2d 31, 35 (Me.1981); M.R.Crim.P. 29(a).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI