State v. Landry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Landry

836 P.2d 1377, 115 Or. App. 169, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1715

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 9, 1992

DocketD91-05815M; CA A72647

StatusPublished

This text of 836 P.2d 1377 (State v. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Landry, 836 P.2d 1377, 115 Or. App. 169, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1715 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. The trial court placed him on probation, subject to the condition, inter alia: “Defendant is prohibited from consuming or possessing any alcoholic liquor in any form under any circumstances.” Defendant contends that the record does not support a conclusion that that condition is reasonably related to his offense, his reformation or protection of the public. The state agrees, and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. The trial court placed him on probation, subject to the condition, inter alia: “Defendant is prohibited from consuming or possessing any alcoholic liquor in any form under any circumstances.” Defendant contends that the record does not support a conclusion that that condition is reasonably related to his offense, his reformation or protection of the public. The state agrees, and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

836 P.2d 1377, 115 Or. App. 169, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-landry-orctapp-1992.