State v. Landry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Landry

836 P.2d 1377, 115 Or. App. 169, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1715

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 9, 1992·No. D91-05815M; CA A72647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. The trial court placed him on probation, subject to the condition, inter alia: “Defendant is prohibited from consuming or possessing any alcoholic liquor in any form under any circumstances.” Defendant contends that the record does not support a conclusion that that condition is reasonably related to his offense, his reformation or protection of the public. The state agrees, and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. The trial court placed him on probation, subject to the condition, inter alia: “Defendant is prohibited from consuming or possessing any alcoholic liquor in any form under any circumstances.” Defendant contends that the record does not support a conclusion that that condition is reasonably related to his offense, his reformation or protection of the public. The state agrees, and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

State v. Landry, 836 P.2d 1377, 115 Or. App. 169, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1715 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

836 P.2d 1377 (State v. Landry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.