State v. Landry

142 So. 3d 9, 2014 WL 2818874, 2014 La. LEXIS 1546
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 20, 2014·No. No. 2013-KD-1171·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 256-545, Keva Land-rum-Johnson, J.; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

|T Granted. The district court erred in failing to grant the state’s motion to stay the re-sentencing hearing. The decision in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively in the defendant’s case. See State v. Tate, 12-2763 (La.11/5/13); 130 So.3d 829, cert. denied, Tate v. Louisiana, No. 13-8915, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2663,189 L.Ed.2d 214, 2014 WL 834279 (May 27, 2014). We recall our previous per curiam opinion in this matter, which remanded to the district court to reconsider the sentence in this case after conducting a new sentencing hearing in accordance with the principles enunciated in Miller v. Alabama, supra. See State ex rel. Landry v. State, 2011-0796 [10] (La.1/18/13); 106 So.3d 106. The district court did not err when it denied relator’s Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence.

JOHNSON, C.J., dissents and would deny the writ with reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Landry, 142 So. 3d 9, 2014 WL 2818874, 2014 La. LEXIS 1546 (La. 2014).

142 So. 3d 9 (State v. Landry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Landry v. State
148 So. 3d 942 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)