State v. Landfald

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Landfald

571 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962, 1990 WL 72120

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1990

DocketNo. 89-02132

StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 10 (State v. Landfald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Landfald, 571 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962, 1990 WL 72120 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

The state has appealed from an order granting Landfald’s motion to suppress contraband seized as the result of a roadblock found unconstitutional by the trial court. We affirm.

The roadblock was set up by the Sheriff pursuant to written guidelines on a two-lane street heavily travelled by cocaine users in an admittedly high crime area. The particular location in the residential area was chosen because traffic was very light at that point. The majority of persons who passed through the stopping point were residents of the area.

Roadblocks are constitutionally permissible if certain guidelines are followed. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. Jones, 483 So.2d 433 (Fla.1986). Roadblocks may be established to stem the flow of drug activity in this state. Cardwell v. State, 482 So.2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In Cardwell, however, the roadblock was set up on a major interstate highway south of the Florida/Georgia border — an important factor distinguishing it from this case. The roadblock in this proceeding was set up at a location essentially residential and the degree of intrusion upon the liberty interests of the citizens living in the area and travelling that particular thoroughfare on a daily basis was severe. Interference in this kind of setting with individual liberty outweighs the state’s undeniably high interest in interdicting the purveyors and users of cocaine, particularly in light of the fact that a seizure such as occurred in this case advances that interest only a slight degree. See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Judge.

The state has appealed from an order granting Landfald’s motion to suppress contraband seized as the result of a roadblock found unconstitutional by the trial court. We affirm.

The roadblock was set up by the Sheriff pursuant to written guidelines on a two-lane street heavily travelled by cocaine users in an admittedly high crime area. The particular location in the residential area was chosen because traffic was very light at that point. The majority of persons who passed through the stopping point were residents of the area.

Roadblocks are constitutionally permissible if certain guidelines are followed. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. Jones, 483 So.2d 433 (Fla.1986). Roadblocks may be established to stem the flow of drug activity in this state. Cardwell v. State, 482 So.2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In Cardwell, however, the roadblock was set up on a major interstate highway south of the Florida/Georgia border — an important factor distinguishing it from this case. The roadblock in this proceeding was set up at a location essentially residential and the degree of intrusion upon the liberty interests of the citizens living in the area and travelling that particular thoroughfare on a daily basis was severe. Interference in this kind of setting with individual liberty outweighs the state’s undeniably high interest in interdicting the purveyors and users of cocaine, particularly in light of the fact that a seizure such as occurred in this case advances that interest only a slight degree. See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962, 1990 WL 72120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-landfald-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack