State v. . Lance

14 S.E. 110, 109 N.C. 789
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 14 S.E. 110 (State v. . Lance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Lance, 14 S.E. 110, 109 N.C. 789 (N.C. 1891).

Opinion

Davis, J.:

Under §§ 737 and 1204 of The Code, in all criminal actions if the defendant be acquitted, nolle prosequi entered, or judgment arrested, if the prosecution shall appear to have been frivolous or malicious the Court may order the prosecutor to pay the costs, whether marked on the bill or not; and, under § 738 of The Code, he may be imprisoned for the non-payment thereof if the Court, Judge or Justice before whom the trial was had “ shall adjudge that the prosecution was frivolous or malicious.” It is found as a fact by the Judge below that the prosecution was both frivolous and malicious, and he adjudged that the prosecutor Sumner pay the costs, and this is conclusive. State v. Hamilton, 106 N C., 660.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Jackson
154 S.E. 402 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
State v. . Trull
85 S.E. 133 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.E. 110, 109 N.C. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lance-nc-1891.