State v. Lancaster

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Lancaster

534 A.2d 627, 13 Conn. App. 801

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedNovember 27, 1987

Docket5656

StatusPublished

This text of 534 A.2d 627 (State v. Lancaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lancaster, 534 A.2d 627, 13 Conn. App. 801 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a complete examination of the record, transcripts and briefs filed in this matter and after having afforded the defendant’s sole claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that the defendant’s claim is not reviewable because of the lack of an adequate record. This case is controlled by State v. Vitale, 190 Conn. 219, 226, 460 A.2d 961 (1983), and State v. Mitchell, 8 Conn. App. 598, 605, 513 A.2d 1268, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 810, 516 A.2d 887 (1986).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a complete examination of the record, transcripts and briefs filed in this matter and after having afforded the defendant’s sole claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that the defendant’s claim is not reviewable because of the lack of an adequate record. This case is controlled by State v. Vitale, 190 Conn. 219, 226, 460 A.2d 961 (1983), and State v. Mitchell, 8 Conn. App. 598, 605, 513 A.2d 1268, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 810, 516 A.2d 887 (1986).

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 A.2d 627, 13 Conn. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lancaster-connappct-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack