State v. Lampe

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lampe

456 S.W.3d 79, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 177, 2015 WL 777645

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2015·No. No. ED 100995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Lampe (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of four counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and admitting at trial evidence obtained during an unlawful search and seizure.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Lampe (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of four counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and admitting at trial evidence obtained during an unlawful search and seizure.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lampe, 456 S.W.3d 79, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 177, 2015 WL 777645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 79 (State v. Lampe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.