State v. Lamothe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lamothe

171 So. 3d 920, 2015 La. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 3475117

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 5, 2015

DocketNo. 2015-KK-866

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 3d 920 (State v. Lamothe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lamothe, 171 So. 3d 920, 2015 La. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 3475117 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

On Supervisory Writs to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. We do not find the defendant was subject to custodial interrogation in this instance, and as a result, the Miranda warnings were not required. See, State v. Thornton, 12-0095, p. 4 (La.3/30/12), 83 So.3d 1024, 1026. Therefore, the statements made by the defendant to the police officer are admissible. The judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress is hereby vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Supervisory Writs to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. We do not find the defendant was subject to custodial interrogation in this instance, and as a result, the Miranda warnings were not required. See, State v. Thornton, 12-0095, p. 4 (La.3/30/12), 83 So.3d 1024, 1026. Therefore, the statements made by the defendant to the police officer are admissible. The judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress is hereby vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 3d 920, 2015 La. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 3475117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lamothe-la-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack