State v. Lamothe

171 So. 3d 920, 2015 La. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 3475117
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 5, 2015·No. No. 2015-KK-866·Published

Opinion

On Supervisory Writs to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. We do not find the defendant was subject to custodial interrogation in this instance, and as a result, the Miranda warnings were not required. See, State v. Thornton, 12-0095, p. 4 (La.3/30/12), 83 So.3d 1024, 1026. Therefore, the statements made by the defendant to the police officer are admissible. The judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress is hereby vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lamothe, 171 So. 3d 920, 2015 La. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 3475117 (La. 2015).

171 So. 3d 920 (State v. Lamothe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thornton
83 So. 3d 1024 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2012)