State v. Lamoreaux
107 A.2d 729, 16 N.J. 167, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 207
Opinion
In Yiew of the admission by the prosecutor in his brief and at the oral argument as to the insufficiency of the proofs to support the indictment, the judgment below, 29 N. J. Super. 204, is affirmed.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lamoreaux, 107 A.2d 729, 16 N.J. 167, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1954).
107 A.2d 729 (State v. Lamoreaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McDougald
577 A.2d 419 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1990)
State v. Boratto
404 A.2d 604 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
State v. Boratto
381 A.2d 704 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Lamb
310 A.2d 102 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)