State v. Lamison

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lamison

692 So. 2d 1057, 1997 La. LEXIS 1454, 1997 WL 225826

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-KP-0519

StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 1057 (State v. Lamison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lamison, 692 So. 2d 1057, 1997 La. LEXIS 1454, 1997 WL 225826 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 364-985; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96KW-2180.

PER CURIAM.

*

The application of the district attorney is granted. The court of appeal, apparently on the basis of an altered transcript, held that one of the predicate guilty pleas introduced by the prosecutor at the multiple offender hearing was insufficient to show a knowing waiver of rights. An unaltered copy of the transcript of the guilty plea colloquy shows that the district judge properly informed relator of the rights he was waiving. This material, along with the other material introduced at the habitual offender adjudication, adequately supports the trial court’s finding that Lamison is a fourth felony offender. See State v. Shelton, 621 So.2d 769, 777 (La. 1993). Counsel therefore did not err to La-mison’s prejudice in failing to raise the issue on appeal. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

The fourth offender adjudication and sentence to life imprisonment are reinstated.

Victory, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 364-985; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96KW-2180.

PER CURIAM.

*

The application of the district attorney is granted. The court of appeal, apparently on the basis of an altered transcript, held that one of the predicate guilty pleas introduced by the prosecutor at the multiple offender hearing was insufficient to show a knowing waiver of rights. An unaltered copy of the transcript of the guilty plea colloquy shows that the district judge properly informed relator of the rights he was waiving. This material, along with the other material introduced at the habitual offender adjudication, adequately supports the trial court’s finding that Lamison is a fourth felony offender. See State v. Shelton, 621 So.2d 769, 777 (La. 1993). Counsel therefore did not err to La-mison’s prejudice in failing to raise the issue on appeal. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

The fourth offender adjudication and sentence to life imprisonment are reinstated.

Victory, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 So. 2d 1057, 1997 La. LEXIS 1454, 1997 WL 225826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lamison-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack