State v. Lamastus

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lamastus

952 S.W.2d 383, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1997 WL 587064

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 23, 1997

DocketNo. 71152

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 952 S.W.2d 383 (State v. Lamastus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lamastus, 952 S.W.2d 383, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1997 WL 587064 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernest Lamastus, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Washington County after a jury found him guilty of rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1994), and sodomy, RSMo section 566.060(1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernest Lamastus, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Washington County after a jury found him guilty of rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1994), and sodomy, RSMo section 566.060(1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

952 S.W.2d 383, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 1997 WL 587064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lamastus-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack