State v. Lamaster

834 S.W.2d 263, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1992 WL 202603
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 25, 1992
DocketNos. WD 43718, WD 45360
StatusPublished

This text of 834 S.W.2d 263 (State v. Lamaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lamaster, 834 S.W.2d 263, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1992 WL 202603 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of second degree robbery. Section 569.030 R.S.Mo. 1986. This appeal has been consolidated with his appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. Rule 29.-15(1).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief is dismissed for failing to raise any issues with respect thereto. State v. Gillispie, 790 S.W.2d 519, 520 (Mo.App.1990); State v. Mayo, 784 S.W.2d 897 (Mo.App.1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gillispie
790 S.W.2d 519 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)
State v. Mayo
784 S.W.2d 897 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 S.W.2d 263, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392, 1992 WL 202603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lamaster-moctapp-1992.