State v. Lamarr
583 P.2d 37, 36 Or. App. 173, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 1806
This text of 583 P.2d 37 (State v. Lamarr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Lamarr, 583 P.2d 37, 36 Or. App. 173, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 1806 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
Opinion
The state concedes that under State v. Stevens, 253 Or 563, 456 P2d 494 (1969), and State v. Wright, 31 Or App 1213, 572 P2d 361 (1977), "the trial court was without authority, when it revoked defendant’s probation, to order that a sentence previously imposed be served consecutively to another sentence imposed during the period of probation.”
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Wright
572 P.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Stevens
456 P.2d 494 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
583 P.2d 37, 36 Or. App. 173, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 1806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lamarr-orctapp-1978.