State v. Lake
This text of 124 P. 1135 (State v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was charged with the crime of false and fraudulent registration, and appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict of guilty. The error alleged is the insufficiency of the information. The case is similar to State v. Ross, 66 Wash. 138, 119 Pac. 20, affirmed by the court on rehearing en bane (Id,, p. 141, 122 Pac. 8), and to State v. Cohen, 67 Wash. 618, 700, 122 Pac. 9, 10, and for the reasons' there given the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 P. 1135, 69 Wash. 697, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lake-wash-1912.