State v. LaFrank

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. LaFrank

959 S.W.2d 874, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2064, 1997 WL 752162

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 1997·No. No. 70847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Samuel L. LaFrank appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of statutory sodomy, first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo (1994). He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of fifteen years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Samuel L. LaFrank appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of statutory sodomy, first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo (1994). He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of fifteen years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. LaFrank, 959 S.W.2d 874, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2064, 1997 WL 752162 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

959 S.W.2d 874 (State v. LaFrank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related