State v. Lafoga

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lafoga. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 Haw. 529
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 2022·No. SCWC-20-0000175·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 12-OCT-2022 01:34 PM Dkt. 19 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRANDON FETU LAFOGA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

RANIER INES, also known as Schizo, Defendant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1PC161001176)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

The court accepts Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Brandon Fetu Lafoga’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on August 19, 2022. Under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1, this court “may limit the question on review.” Here, we limit the question on review to questions presented numbers 2 and 4 of Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari.

Oral argument will be scheduled. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 12, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lafoga, (haw 2022).

State v. Lafoga (State v. Lafoga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.