State v. Lafoga
This text of State v. Lafoga (State v. Lafoga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 12-OCT-2022 01:28 PM Dkt. 17 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BRANDON FETU LAFOGA, Defendant,
and
RANIER INES, also known as Schizo, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1PC161001176)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
The court accepts Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant
Ranier Ines’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on August
18, 2022.
Under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1,
this court “may limit the question on review.” Here, we limit
the question on review to questions presented numbers I and III
of Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari. Oral argument will be scheduled. The parties will be
notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 12, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Lafoga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lafoga-haw-2022.