State v. Lafleur

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Lafleur

464 So. 2d 313, 1985 La. LEXIS 8252

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 8, 1985

DocketNo. 85-K-0067

StatusPublished

This text of 464 So. 2d 313 (State v. Lafleur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lafleur, 464 So. 2d 313, 1985 La. LEXIS 8252 (La. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Lafleur, Wilbert Jr., applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR-84-640; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 4965-83.

Prior Report: 461 So.2d 1167.

[314]*314Denied, noting that the Court of Appeal erroneously stated the maximum sentence for theft of a value of $100 or more but less than $500 was 10 years. The sentence as set forth in R.S. 14:67 for such theft is imprisonment “with or without hard labor, for not more than two years” or a fine of “not more than $2,000.00, or both.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lafleur, Wilbert Jr., applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR-84-640; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 4965-83.

Prior Report: 461 So.2d 1167.

[314]*314Denied, noting that the Court of Appeal erroneously stated the maximum sentence for theft of a value of $100 or more but less than $500 was 10 years. The sentence as set forth in R.S. 14:67 for such theft is imprisonment “with or without hard labor, for not more than two years” or a fine of “not more than $2,000.00, or both.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 So. 2d 313, 1985 La. LEXIS 8252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lafleur-la-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack