State v. LaFlam
570 A.2d 163, 152 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 237
This text of 570 A.2d 163 (State v. LaFlam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. LaFlam, 570 A.2d 163, 152 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 237 (Vt. 1989).
Opinion
We cannot conclude, on this record, defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel during the hearing on his motion to withdraw his plea. The claim was not raised below. If there is support for such a conclusion, it must be developed in a collateral proceeding. Berard v. Moeykens, 132 Vt. 597, 600, 326 A.2d 166, 168 (1974).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Berard v. Moeykens
326 A.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
570 A.2d 163, 152 Vt. 645, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laflam-vt-1989.