State v. Lackey

2 Ind. 285
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 26, 1850
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ind. 285 (State v. Lackey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lackey, 2 Ind. 285 (Ind. 1850).

Opinion

Blackford, J.

Indictment for lewdness.

This indictment was found in the Hamilton Circuit Court, at the September term, 1848. It was quashed at the September term, 1849, on the ground that the Court had no jurisdiction of the cause.

At the time this indictment was found, the Hamilton Circuit Court had jurisdiction of the suit. R. S. 1843, p. 977, s. 81.

In January, 1849, an act passed giving to justices of the peace exclusive jurisdiction, in Hamilton county, over offences like the present one. That act took effect from its passage. Acts of 1849, p. 78.

There being no clause in the act of 1849 for the saving of pending suits, the Circuit Court, after the passage of that act, had no jurisdiction of the indictment. Any subsequent proceedings in the case would have been coram non judice and void. The indictment, therefore, was correctly quashed, at the September term, 1849, for want of jurisdiction. Taylor v. The State, 7 Blackf. 93.

Per Curiam.

-The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
7 Blackf. 93 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ind. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lackey-ind-1850.