State v. Lackawanna Railroad

82 A. 851, 82 N.J.L. 747, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 300
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 851 (State v. Lackawanna Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lackawanna Railroad, 82 A. 851, 82 N.J.L. 747, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 300 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the Chief Justice in delivering the opinion of the Supreme Court.

[748]*748We think that the charge of the trial judge did not amount to a direction of a verdict for the state, although the necessary logical result of his charge was a verdict of guilty. It is unnecessary, therefore, to pass upon the right of the court to direct a verdict for the state upon the trial of an indictment.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 851, 82 N.J.L. 747, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lackawanna-railroad-nj-1912.