State v. LaBore

26 Vt. 765
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redeield, Ch. J.

It seems to be regarded as a uniform rule of pleading, applicable to indictments, that every traversable fact must be directly alleged, with time and place. The first marriage, in prosecutions for bigamy, is always traversable, and must be established, by positive proof of the very fact of marriage, if such proof is attainable. It is not claimed, that such fact is here so alleged, the time and place being both blank. This merely is formal, and of the least possible importance, but unless all form is to be disregarded, (which we could not do without a statute to that effect, after having so long regarded it as essential,) then this indictment is fatally defective.

Judgment reversed, and judgment that the indictment is insufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. LaBore, 26 Vt. 765 (Vt. 1854).

26 Vt. 765 (State v. LaBore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. State
192 P. 1117 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)
State v. North
96 A. 702 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Bryan v. State
111 S.W. 744 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Moline v. State
93 N.W. 228 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Cathron v. State
40 Fla. 468 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1898)
McAfee v. State
41 S.W. 627 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Hutchins v. State
28 Ind. 34 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1867)
State v. Litch
33 Vt. 67 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1860)