State v. Laborde

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Laborde

543 So. 2d 1051, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 926, 1989 WL 50638

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 24, 1989

DocketNo. K 89-437

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 1051 (State v. Laborde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Laborde, 543 So. 2d 1051, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 926, 1989 WL 50638 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Relator was convicted of a misdemeanor offense on April 8, 1987 and was sentenced on April 22, 1987. On May 4, 1987, relator obtained from the trial court an order for appeal of his conviction and sentence which was made returnable on June 30, 1987. After the record was forwarded to this Court for lodging of the appeal, this Court returned the record to the trial court with instructions to the trial court and counsel for relator to seek judicial review in this Court by application for writ of review. See, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 912.1(C)(1). In the interim, relator satisfied his sentence by paying his fine and satisfactorily completing the terms of his probation. Relator did not seek a writ of review of his conviction and sentence until February 29, 1989 when the trial court denied relator’s application for a writ of review. This writ application was then filed to review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of relator’s application for a writ of review of his conviction and sentence. Satisfaction of sentence by relator renders this case moot so as to preclude [1052]*1052review of, or attack on, relator’s conviction and sentence. Cf. State v. Morris, 328 So.2d 65 (La.1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Relator was convicted of a misdemeanor offense on April 8, 1987 and was sentenced on April 22, 1987. On May 4, 1987, relator obtained from the trial court an order for appeal of his conviction and sentence which was made returnable on June 30, 1987. After the record was forwarded to this Court for lodging of the appeal, this Court returned the record to the trial court with instructions to the trial court and counsel for relator to seek judicial review in this Court by application for writ of review. See, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 912.1(C)(1). In the interim, relator satisfied his sentence by paying his fine and satisfactorily completing the terms of his probation. Relator did not seek a writ of review of his conviction and sentence until February 29, 1989 when the trial court denied relator’s application for a writ of review. This writ application was then filed to review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of relator’s application for a writ of review of his conviction and sentence. Satisfaction of sentence by relator renders this case moot so as to preclude [1052]*1052review of, or attack on, relator’s conviction and sentence. Cf. State v. Morris, 328 So.2d 65 (La.1976).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 So. 2d 1051, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 926, 1989 WL 50638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-laborde-lactapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack