State v. Labare

382 A.2d 866, 1978 Me. LEXIS 1081
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedFebruary 24, 1978
StatusPublished

This text of 382 A.2d 866 (State v. Labare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Labare, 382 A.2d 866, 1978 Me. LEXIS 1081 (Me. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The presiding justice did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of a pre-indictment, out-of-court lineup involving the defendant. No right to counsel attached at that stage in the proceedings. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 92 S.Ct. 1877, 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972); State v. Niemszyk, Me., 303 A.2d 105 (1973). Furthermore, although the presiding justice failed to make “explicit, on-the-record findings” as to the out-of-court identification, see State v. Colby, Me., 361 A.2d 256, 262 (1976), we conclude from the evidence that the lineup was not impermissibly suggestive. State v. Boucher, Me., 376 A.2d 478, 479 (1977).

The entry must be:

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.

DELAHANTY, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirby v. Illinois
406 U.S. 682 (Supreme Court, 1972)
State v. Boucher
376 A.2d 478 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1977)
State v. Colby
361 A.2d 256 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
State v. Niemszyk
303 A.2d 105 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 A.2d 866, 1978 Me. LEXIS 1081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-labare-me-1978.