State v. La Roda
This text of 622 P.2d 756 (State v. La Roda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-42, 368 P2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 P.2d 756, 50 Or. App. 181, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-la-roda-orctapp-1981.