State v. La Roda

622 P.2d 756, 50 Or. App. 181, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2273
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 26, 1981
DocketNo. CR 79-0449, CA 18797
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 622 P.2d 756 (State v. La Roda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. La Roda, 622 P.2d 756, 50 Or. App. 181, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2273 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-42, 368 P2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Clevenger
683 P.2d 1360 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 P.2d 756, 50 Or. App. 181, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-la-roda-orctapp-1981.