State v. La Barge

234 Wis. 449
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. La Barge. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 Wis. 449
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1940·Published

Opinion

Martin, J.

It will serve no useful purpose to- again discuss the law applicable to the facts set out above. The question here certified must be answered in the affirmative upon the authority of State v. Morrin (1908), 136 Wis. 552, 117 N. W. 1006, and State v. Johnson (1933), 212 Wis. 301, 249 N. W. 284; also upon the authority of Ward v. Race Horse, 163 U. S. 504, 16 Sup. Ct. 1076, 41 L. Ed. 244, and People ex rel. Kennedy v. Becker, 241 U. S. 556, 36 Sup. Ct. 705, 60 L. Ed. 1166, and the cases therein cited.

By the Court. — The question certified to this court is answered in the affirmative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. La Barge, 234 Wis. 449 (Wis. 1940).

234 Wis. 449 (State v. La Barge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Race Horse
163 U.S. 504 (Supreme Court, 1896)
New York Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Becker
241 U.S. 556 (Supreme Court, 1916)
State v. Morrin
117 N.W. 1006 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
State v. Johnson
249 N.W. 284 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1933)