State v. L. M. S.

238 P.3d 438, 237 Or. App. 209, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1005
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 1, 2010·No. 300903095; A141498·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She argues that the state failed to prove any of the alleged bases for commitment. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record,1 we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. L. M. S., 238 P.3d 438, 237 Or. App. 209, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1005 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

238 P.3d 438 (State v. L. M. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 19.415
Oregon § 19.415
§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130