State v. L. L. F.
This text of 168 P.3d 311 (State v. L. L. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself or others or unable to provide for her basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence was not sufficient for an involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 P.3d 311, 215 Or. App. 63, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-l-l-f-orctapp-2007.