State v. L. L. F.

168 P.3d 311, 215 Or. App. 63, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1288
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 12, 2007·No. 070160168; A134739·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself or others or unable to provide for her basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence was not sufficient for an involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. L. L. F., 168 P.3d 311, 215 Or. App. 63, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1288 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

168 P.3d 311 (State v. L. L. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005