State v. L. H.
203 P.3d 297, 226 Or. App. 265, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 91
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 25, 2009·No. 080160790; A138169·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant argues that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that he was a danger to others because of a mental disorder. The state agrees that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. L. H., 203 P.3d 297, 226 Or. App. 265, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 91 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
203 P.3d 297 (State v. L. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Lh
203 P.3d 297 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)