State v. L. H.
203 P.3d 297, 226 Or. App. 265, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 91
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 25, 2009
Docket080160790; A138169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 203 P.3d 297 (State v. L. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. L. H., 203 P.3d 297, 226 Or. App. 265, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 91 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant argues that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that he was a danger to others because of a mental disorder. The state agrees that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Matter of Lh
203 P.3d 297 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
203 P.3d 297, 226 Or. App. 265, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-l-h-orctapp-2009.