State v. L. B.
This text of 280 P.3d 395 (State v. L. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to himself as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 P.3d 395, 250 Or. App. 288, 2012 WL 1964560, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-l-b-orctapp-2012.