State v. L. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. L. B.

206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 229, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 343

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 29, 2009

Docket080869061; A140093

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.3d 1211 (State v. L. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. L. B., 206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 229, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 343 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered a judgment of involuntary commitment based on its finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to meet her basic needs. On appeal, appellant argues that the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered a judgment of involuntary commitment based on its finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to meet her basic needs. On appeal, appellant argues that the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 229, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-l-b-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack