State v. L. B.

206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 229, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 343
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 29, 2009·No. 080869061; A140093·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The trial court entered a judgment of involuntary commitment based on its finding that appellant suffers from a mental disorder that renders her unable to meet her basic needs. On appeal, appellant argues that the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. L. B., 206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 229, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 343 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

206 P.3d 1211 (State v. L. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. LB
206 P.3d 1211 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)