State v. Kyles

867 S.W.2d 674, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968, 1993 WL 524285
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 1993·No. Nos. 61570, 63584·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, heroin, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Supp. 1992. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a seven year prison term. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential [675]*675value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kyles, 867 S.W.2d 674, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1968, 1993 WL 524285 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

867 S.W.2d 674 (State v. Kyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.