State v. Kyle

359 S.W.3d 129, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1734, 2011 WL 6755978
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2011·No. WD 73733·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Renee Kyle was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped by a Highway Patrol officer for speeding. After the driver consented to a search, the officer recovered marijuana from the glove compartment. Kyle was convicted of possession of up to thirty-five grams of marijuana. She appeals, arguing that the officer’s testimony as to the driver’s statement of consent was inadmissible hearsay, and that the driver’s consent to search was ineffective, because it was given only after the stop should have legally concluded. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this *130 order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kyle, 359 S.W.3d 129, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1734, 2011 WL 6755978 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

359 S.W.3d 129 (State v. Kyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taube v. Treasurer of the State
359 S.W.3d 129 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)