State v. Kuplen

752 S.E.2d 499, 367 N.C. 277, 2013 WL 6910420, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1483
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 18, 2013·No. 459P13·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Suspend or Vary Rules of Procedure to File PDR and Associate Documents (COAP13-577)

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion for PDR

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion for NOA of Right

4. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

5. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Suspension of Rules

1. Dismissed as Moot

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed Ex Mero Motu

4. Allowed

5. Dismiss as Moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kuplen, 752 S.E.2d 499, 367 N.C. 277, 2013 WL 6910420, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1483 (N.C. 2013).

752 S.E.2d 499 (State v. Kuplen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.