State v. Kuhn
This text of 405 N.W.2d 9 (State v. Kuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kuhn appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for postconviction relief related to his entry of a plea of guilty to a charge of robbery. His brief before this court contains no assignments of error, and, as a result, the judgment will be affirmed in the absence of any plain error we may note. Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(l)d (rev. 1986); Reynolds v. Myers, 224 Neb. 509, 398 N.W.2d 722 (1987).
We have reviewed the record and find that the process used by the court when accepting Kuhn’s plea of guilty conforms with the requirements of State v. Irish, 223 Neb. 814, 394 N.W.2d 879 (1986). We note no plain error. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
405 N.W.2d 9, 225 Neb. 300, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kuhn-neb-1987.