State v. Kuhn

405 N.W.2d 9, 225 Neb. 300, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 881
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 1987·No. No. 86-844·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Kuhn appeals from the district court’s denial of his request for postconviction relief related to his entry of a plea of guilty to a charge of robbery. His brief before this court contains no assignments of error, and, as a result, the judgment will be affirmed in the absence of any plain error we may note. Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(l)d (rev. 1986); Reynolds v. Myers, 224 Neb. 509, 398 N.W.2d 722 (1987).

We have reviewed the record and find that the process used by the court when accepting Kuhn’s plea of guilty conforms with the requirements of State v. Irish, 223 Neb. 814, 394 N.W.2d 879 (1986). We note no plain error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kuhn, 405 N.W.2d 9, 225 Neb. 300, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 881 (Neb. 1987).

405 N.W.2d 9 (State v. Kuhn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Irish
394 N.W.2d 879 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Reynolds v. Myers
398 N.W.2d 722 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)