State v. KUEGEL

674 S.E.2d 680, 363 N.C. 134

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. KUEGEL. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 N.C. 378 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 13, 2009·No. 70P09·Published

Opinion

674 S.E.2d 680 (2009)

No. 70P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 13, 2009.

Robert Curran, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 672 S.E.2d 97.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of February 2009 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of February 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

674 S.E.2d 680 (2009)

No. 70P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 13, 2009.

Robert Curran, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 672 S.E.2d 97.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of February 2009 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of February 2009."

State v. KUEGEL, 674 S.E.2d 680, 363 N.C. 134 (N.C. 2009).

Pincite

674 S.E.2d 680 (State v. KUEGEL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

672 S.E.2d 97 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)