State v. Kudelka

135 A. 920, 103 N.J.L. 506, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 224
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kudelka, 135 A. 920, 103 N.J.L. 506, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 224 (N.J. 1927).

135 A. 920 (State v. Kudelka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.