State v. Krstoth

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Krstoth. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 268
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2015·No. SCWC-14-0001143·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001143 20-NOV-2015 10:43 AM

SCWC-14-0001143

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TAKSON KRSTOTH, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001143; CR. NO. 11-1-1293)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Takson Krstoth’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 9, 2015, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 20, 2015.

William Li /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Loren J. Thomas for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Krstoth, (haw 2015).

State v. Krstoth (State v. Krstoth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.