State v. KRIJGER
This text of 28 A.3d 992 (State v. KRIJGER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Stephen J. KRIJGER.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Richard E. Condon, Jr., senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 130 Conn.App. 470, 24 A.3d 42, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant's convictions were based upon `true threats' and were not protected speech under the first and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution?"
EVELEIGH and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.3d 992, 302 Conn. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-krijger-conn-2011.