State v. Kridler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kridler

530 S.W.3d 612

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 2017

DocketWD 79650

StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.W.3d 612 (State v. Kridler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kridler, 530 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cherish Kridler appeals her conviction following a jury trial for the class C felony statutory rape in the second degree and sentence of four years imprisonment. She asserts that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial when a police officer testified that Kridler told her husband that it was acceptable to flirt with the victim because her husband had flirted with her when he was the victim’s age. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cherish Kridler appeals her conviction following a jury trial for the class C felony statutory rape in the second degree and sentence of four years imprisonment. She asserts that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial when a police officer testified that Kridler told her husband that it was acceptable to flirt with the victim because her husband had flirted with her when he was the victim’s age. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.W.3d 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kridler-moctapp-2017.