State v. Krider

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Krider

547 S.E.2d 32, 353 N.C. 391, 2001 WL 136320

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 1, 2001

DocketNo. 279A00

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 547 S.E.2d 32 (State v. Krider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Krider, 547 S.E.2d 32, 353 N.C. 391, 2001 WL 136320 (N.C. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon defendant’s notice of appeal from the opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed 16 May 2000, and defendant’s motion for appropriate relief, the Court ex mero motu remands the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of this court’s opinion in State v. Thomas Richard Jones (No. 347A99, filed 21 December 2000). Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal based upon a constitutional question denied 1 February 2001. Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss motion for appropriate relief denied 1 February 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon defendant’s notice of appeal from the opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed 16 May 2000, and defendant’s motion for appropriate relief, the Court ex mero motu remands the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of this court’s opinion in State v. Thomas Richard Jones (No. 347A99, filed 21 December 2000). Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss appeal based upon a constitutional question denied 1 February 2001. Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss motion for appropriate relief denied 1 February 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 S.E.2d 32, 353 N.C. 391, 2001 WL 136320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-krider-nc-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack