State v. Kreischer

825 N.E.2d 621, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1497

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kreischer. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Ohio St. 3d 391 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 13, 2005·No. 2005-0412·Published

Opinion

Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed February 23, 2005:

‘Whether a court may order restitution by an offender pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) to include medical costs paid on behalf of the victim by a third-party insurer?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0216, State v. Kreischer, Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854.

The conflict case is State v. Miller, Lucas App. No. L-01-1265, 2002-Ohio-853.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘Whether a court may order restitution by an offender pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) to include medical costs paid on behalf of the victim by a third-party insurer?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0216, State v. Kreischer, Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854.

The conflict case is State v. Miller, Lucas App. No. L-01-1265, 2002-Ohio-853.

State v. Kreischer, 825 N.E.2d 621, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1497 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

825 N.E.2d 621 (State v. Kreischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Kreischer, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2004)

2004 Ohio 6854 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Opinion

Related