State v. Krapff
79 P. 1133, 71 Kan. 841, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 240
Opinion
The state did not help its case by using the deposition of Peter Krapff, the owner of the property. It was necessary to show knowledge on his part that the premises were used for unlawful purposes. (Cordes v. The State, 37 Kan. 48, 14 Pac. 493). The deposition of the owner tended to disprove this.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Krapff, 79 P. 1133, 71 Kan. 841, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 240 (kan 1905).
79 P. 1133 (State v. Krapff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cordes v. State
37 Kan. 48 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)