State v. Koziol

130 N.W.2d 557, 177 Neb. 648, 1964 Neb. LEXIS 130
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 9, 1964
DocketNo. 35731
StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.W.2d 557 (State v. Koziol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Koziol, 130 N.W.2d 557, 177 Neb. 648, 1964 Neb. LEXIS 130 (Neb. 1964).

Opinion

Carter, J.

Defendant was charged in the district court for Nance County with unlawfully and willfully operating a motor vehicle upon the highways in said county while:under the influence of alcoholic liquor. Defendant entered a plea of guilty and he was thereupon sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail of Nance County and to pay a fine of $100 and costs. It was also ordered that the operator’s license of defendant be revoked for a period of 6 months from the date of his release from the county jail. The only assignment of error is the contention of defendant that the sentence is excessive.

The record discloses that defendant was called to the stand and testified before sentence was imposed. He testified that he was 24 years of age and unmarried. He had employed legal counsel. The court was advised by the defendant, upon inquiry, that he was guilty. He admitted that he had previously been twice convicted for reckless driving and once for speeding. The sentence imposed was within the limits prescribed by section 39-727, R. S. Supp., 1963. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the sentence is excessive. The record discloses no extenuating circumstances of any kind.

The case is controlled by our holding in State v. Ohler, ante p. 418, 129 N. W. 2d 116, wherein we said: “Where the punishment of an offense, created by statute, is left to the discretion of a court, to be exercised within certain-prescribed limits, a sentence imposed within such limits will not be disturbed unless there appears to' be an abuse of such discretion.”

Since there is nothing in the record indicating an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in imposing the sentence that it did, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ohler
129 N.W.2d 116 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 N.W.2d 557, 177 Neb. 648, 1964 Neb. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-koziol-neb-1964.