State v. Kowalskey

116 S.W.3d 709, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1465, 2003 WL 22137041
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2003·No. No. ED 80970·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Kowalskey (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 666.062, RSMo 2000, and two counts of child molestation in the first degree, Section 666.067, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment on each of the statutory sodomy counts with consecutive terms of concurrent twenty years’ imprisonment on each of the child molestation counts. Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a Trauma Symptom Checklist and the testimony relating to the checklist.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the [710] claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kowalskey, 116 S.W.3d 709, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1465, 2003 WL 22137041 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

116 S.W.3d 709 (State v. Kowalskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kowalskey v. State
216 S.W.3d 179 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)