State v. Koski

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. Koski

274 A.2d 165, 108 R.I. 276, 1971 R.I. LEXIS 1259

DecidedMarch 11, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 274 A.2d 165 (State v. Koski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Koski, 274 A.2d 165, 108 R.I. 276, 1971 R.I. LEXIS 1259 (R.I. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was indicted for breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit larceny. He was tried before a justice of the Superior Court sitting without a jury and was found guilty.

The case is before us on defendant’s exception to the decision of the trial justice. The defendant’s counsel consumed less than one minute before us in arguing the contentions made by him in his brief. After consideration of his oral presentation, and the issues outlined in his brief, we have come to the conclusion that his arguments are lacking in merit to such an extent as to require no discussion.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, Scott K. Keefer, Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. Aram K. Berberian, for defendant.

The defendant’s exception is overruled, and the case is remitted to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant was indicted for breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit larceny. He was tried before a justice of the Superior Court sitting without a jury and was found guilty.

The case is before us on defendant’s exception to the decision of the trial justice. The defendant’s counsel consumed less than one minute before us in arguing the contentions made by him in his brief. After consideration of his oral presentation, and the issues outlined in his brief, we have come to the conclusion that his arguments are lacking in merit to such an extent as to require no discussion.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, Scott K. Keefer, Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. Aram K. Berberian, for defendant.

The defendant’s exception is overruled, and the case is remitted to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.2d 165, 108 R.I. 276, 1971 R.I. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-koski-ri-1971.