State v. Kori Arden Freer
This text of State v. Kori Arden Freer (State v. Kori Arden Freer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 41550
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 757 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: October 14, 2014 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) KORI ARDEN FREER, aka KORI ARDEN ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED WARD, KORI ALLEN FREER, KORI ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT WARD WARD, ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY ) Defendant-Appellant. ) )
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. George A. Southworth, District Judge.
Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge
PER CURIAM Kori Arden Freer was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37- 2732(c)(1). The district court imposed a unified sentence of three years with eighteen months determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Freer on probation. Subsequently, Freer violated the terms of his probation. The district court revoked probation, ordered execution of the underlying sentence, and retained jurisdiction. Prior to the conclusion of the retained jurisdiction program, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and ordered execution of the sentence. Freer appeals the district court’s decision to relinquish jurisdiction and contends that
1 the court abused its discretion in failing to sua sponte reduce his sentence upon relinquishing jurisdiction. Our decision in State v. Clontz, 156 Idaho 787, 792, 331 P.3d 529, 534 (Ct. App. 2014), forecloses a claim that a district court erred by failing to sua sponte reduce an underlying sentence upon relinquishing jurisdiction. Therefore, we will not further address the claim. The order relinquishing jurisdiction and directing execution of Freer’s previously suspended sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Kori Arden Freer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kori-arden-freer-idahoctapp-2014.