State v. Kootlas
207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91
This text of 207 P. 1116 (State v. Kootlas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Kootlas, 207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91 (Idaho 1922).
Opinion
The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief or statement of points and authorities and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)
Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kootlas-idaho-1922.