State v. Kootlas

207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 1922·Published

Opinion

MCCARTHY, J.

The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief or statement of points and authorities and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)

Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Budge, Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kootlas, 207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91 (Idaho 1922).

207 P. 1116 (State v. Kootlas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)