State v. Kootlas
207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91
Opinion
The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief or statement of points and authorities and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)
Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kootlas, 207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 483, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 91 (Idaho 1922).
207 P. 1116 (State v. Kootlas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)